The "No Questions Asked Rule"
Jun. 30th, 2006 06:13 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So I know that the kids are still young, but I’d be lying if I said that we haven’t considered what we’re going to do when they hit teenagehood. On the one hand, we’re both want a better relationship than we had with our parents. On the other hand, we want to make sure that the kids don’t confuse our understanding where they’re coming from, with condoning some of the things they might do.
Which brings me to the “No Questions Asked Policy”. Some of my friends in highschool had this happening with their parents. And in speaking with friends of mine that have teenaged children now, this philsophy is very much alive and well. If they were out and they had had too much to drink, or something had gone awry, they were to call their parents, and the parents would come get them - no questions asked. With some of my firends this acually worked pretty well. They were sensible kids who occassionally took things too far, and the parents stuck to their word (although it must have been hell), and didn’t ask questions, and didn’t bring up the incident.
But there were a few weren’t so level headed and they got into some pretty heavy drugs in a big way. At what point does the getting my kids home safely, and keeping open lines of communication turn into condoning dangerous behaviour, or enabling them? At what point should a parent break that trust?
Which brings me to the “No Questions Asked Policy”. Some of my friends in highschool had this happening with their parents. And in speaking with friends of mine that have teenaged children now, this philsophy is very much alive and well. If they were out and they had had too much to drink, or something had gone awry, they were to call their parents, and the parents would come get them - no questions asked. With some of my firends this acually worked pretty well. They were sensible kids who occassionally took things too far, and the parents stuck to their word (although it must have been hell), and didn’t ask questions, and didn’t bring up the incident.
But there were a few weren’t so level headed and they got into some pretty heavy drugs in a big way. At what point does the getting my kids home safely, and keeping open lines of communication turn into condoning dangerous behaviour, or enabling them? At what point should a parent break that trust?
no subject
Date: 2006-07-01 01:34 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-07-01 02:28 am (UTC)p.s. is that a picture of you on your icon?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-07-01 01:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-07-01 09:38 pm (UTC)an abominationa rite of passage for teens who've just finished high school - it's basically a week of unrestricted partying. Anyway... I have found that the most important message a teen can have when they're out experimenting is that they can always call home for rescue. No matter what time, how far away, or how badly they've crossed the line.I had that, growing up. I knew that there would be some cases in which I'd be in serious trouble - but I also always knew that firstly, my parents would come and rescue me, and secondly, they'd eventually calm down. I think it's the middle ground - yes, you will always be there to bail your kids out, but they can't expect (as I never expected) that some things would go unchallenged. That's one of the ways I knew my parents loved me.
I love the comment above: we'll come and pick you up if you get drunk, but you're coming along to pick up the car at 6am... perfect! That's what I call 'natural justice'. =)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2006-07-02 12:33 am (UTC)One thing that I've noticed that is cool among my younger friends is that they are always very concerned about whether people are good to drive and will insist on paying for cabs or sleeping over if people don't seem good. And having a good group of friends makes that safer.
I think the lesson is to say that friends support each others' safety and if there is a sense that is not occurring to just watch that relationship out.
As for preventing experimentation, I am not sure what on earth can be done about that. Information is power, and accurate information is ideal. I worry about dire warnings against marijuana and whether some kids try that drug, realize that they simply felt peaceful, happy, and really liked that concert they went to, and wonder what else they are missing. One thing that my friend does that is kind of interesting is talk with her kid about how very, very sad drug addiction is, and also how the people who make the money off these drugs (though I cannot realistically apply this to marijuana) are the same people involved in organized crime (ie. who enslave women through prostitution, engage in revenge murder, and seek to undermine the health of our society).
so my opinion which is probably worth little, since I have no kids, is that realistic ongoing dialogue from an early age is a great idea.
There is a fantastic Crystal meth ad on TV in alberta that I swear scares the shit out of everyone I know. 2nd ad/media file at this website:
http://corp.aadac.com/other_drugs/the_basics_about_other_drugs/crystal_meth_resources.asp
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: